| View previous topic :: View next topic |
|
FreeUSHGA
3 thumbs up
Joined: 25 Dec 2009
Posts: 243
Location: Kansas City
|
 Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 8:52 pm Post subject: Downwind Faster Than The Wind? |
 #1 |
That's interesting stuff.. the things that engineers come up with..
It sure looks pretty convincing.
Now, can someone explain to me how steel core buildings collapse at very near the speed of free fall gravity? I just don't get that one..
http://www.ae911truth.org/ |
|
|
|
|
wild_high_mark
3 thumbs up
Joined: 01 Jun 2008
Posts: 99
Location: Lakeview
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 2:24 am Post subject: Re: Downwind Faster Than The Wind? |
#2 |
| FreeUSHGA wrote: |
That's interesting stuff.. the things that engineers come up with..
It sure looks pretty convincing. |
Ooh it works, just barely. You can bring that full size one to a stop with one hand.
This is the topic that I got my one thumb down from Rob McKenzie (how was I to know he used to be a high school counselor?).
http://www.hanggliding.org/viewtopic.php?p=111380#111380
| SeeMarkFly wrote: |
| BubbleBoy wrote: |
| Mark, spork has been directly responsible for more cases of *actual* DDWFTTW achievement than any other person on earth. |
So he is heading "full speed" down a dead end street.
This is a machine that has no application.
A full size working model can be brought to a screeching halt with......finger pressure.
A machine that is so close to NOT working that you need a slide-rule and good college education to prove it does work.
And now (self proclaimed) he is going to waste the rest of his "productive years" informing everyone of his achievements.
spork, seek out your high school job counselor....and kill him.
He was just filling in for the day and didn't realize you were going to take him seriously.
As for a new direction, I hear they are have a tough time with "Effervescence logs" or something at Lock Ness. Here's a picture. |
Yea, there are a more than a few questions about how two separate buildings come down in an identical fashion within hours of each other from two separate incidents.
Midtown Manhattan demolition, so easy a cave man can do it!
Not to mention that the electric grid for that block was off for the entire day (very rare) three days before the "accident".
But how that we have Obama, things are going to change!
Taxpayers voting for Obama is like chickens voting for Colonel Sanders. |
|
|
|
|
FreeUSHGA
3 thumbs up
Joined: 25 Dec 2009
Posts: 243
Location: Kansas City
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 7:13 am Post subject: Re: Downwind Faster Than The Wind? |
#3 |
| wild_high_mark wrote: |
This is a machine that has no application.
A full size working model can be brought to a screeching halt with......finger pressure.
|
An exercise in the minute measurement of mechanical advantage that has no practical application?
| wild_high_mark wrote: |
there are a more than a few questions about how two separate buildings come down in an identical fashion within hours of each other from two separate incidents.
Midtown Manhattan demolition, so easy a cave man can do it!
. |
Three buildings were demolished at near the speed of free fall gravity that day. Building 7 came down about 8 hrs. later after the plane that was supposed to hit it disintegrated in Pennsylvania.
Simple laws of physics were broken and we are to believe that cave men with boxcutters pulled off this scientific anomaly?
| wild_high_mark wrote: |
Taxpayers voting for Obama is like chickens voting for Colonel Sanders. |
We are so gullible. We are like children that want to believe in fairy tales.
The wolf is at the door, the house is on fire and this isn't a fairy tale.
Maybe some of the engineers here could have a look at issues that over a thousand professional architects and engineers have raised about 9-11 and its implications.
http://www.ae911truth.org/ |
|
|
|
|
wild_high_mark
3 thumbs up
Joined: 01 Jun 2008
Posts: 99
Location: Lakeview
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 8:59 am Post subject: Re: Downwind Faster Than The Wind? |
#4 |
| FreeUSHGA wrote: |
| An exercise in the minute measurement of mechanical advantage that has no practical application? |
We both know there is a line that can't be crossed to "perpetual motion". How close to that line would you like to get?
I don't want an "energy efficient" vacuum cleaner. I want to turn that thing on and suck all the dirt out of my rug in record time and then put it away.
I don't want a car that will only "make it" to the last car payment. I want that car to last me till I am SICK of it.
But spork himself even admits that there is no practical application for this thing. It only works when traveling across the ground so unless you can design a track that goes all the way around the planet, at some point, you have to push it back to the starting place (hence you don't actually see the "loss" till someone asks you to help them push it back). |
|
|
|
|
FreeUSHGA
3 thumbs up
Joined: 25 Dec 2009
Posts: 243
Location: Kansas City
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 10:04 am Post subject: Re: Downwind Faster Than The Wind? |
#5 |
| wild_high_mark wrote: |
But spork himself even admits that there is no practical application for this thing. |
Wow, thousands of pages of discussion, years of expense, experimentation and modeling, for a machine with no practical application.
But there is proof of concept.
Something to put in the book...
Determining how the laws of physics were altered on 9-11, remain a mystery.
What would it take to get JB and Spork to take a stab at that?
Other engineers?
http://www.ae911truth.org/ |
|
|
|
|
wild_high_mark
3 thumbs up
Joined: 01 Jun 2008
Posts: 99
Location: Lakeview
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 11:27 am Post subject: Re: Downwind Faster Than The Wind? |
#6 |
| FreeUSHGA wrote: |
| What would it take to get JB and Spork to take a stab at that? |
I think it's called "too far from the problem".
A LOT of people won't do anything till their house is on fire. 
I watched the animated explanation and, while it was a "plausible" explanation, it failed to convince even me. Things don't fall straight, these buildings did (look at ANY video of a building implosion gone wrong).
I was also aware of the NY city building department looking into numerous code violations that would ultimately involve tearing down the buildings (mostly asbestos but some structural).
That action would have bankrupted the parent company.
Also no real explanation for the electric grid in that neighborhood to be off for an entire day (very rare) three days before the "accident" (no RF interference (Ham radio (known to "bother" blasting caps))).
The buildings were build "too economical". It worked fine for a few years but time and fatigue (wind) and gravity took it's toll.
AND a very creative solution was needed.......for the "bankers" involved.
I don't remember them asking me what I thought should be done.
ALSO a "few" pictures of that 747 with a telemetry pod under it, weird! |
|
|
|
|
FreeUSHGA
3 thumbs up
Joined: 25 Dec 2009
Posts: 243
Location: Kansas City
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 12:27 pm Post subject: Re: Downwind Faster Than The Wind? |
#7 |
| wild_high_mark wrote: |
| A LOT of people won't do anything till their house is on fire. |
Everyone's house is on fire. We are under attack by globalist bankers that seek to enslave us. Teleprompted puppets are only front men for the crooks behind the curtains.
"Hope and change" were insidious marketing tools to hypnotize and distract us.
The targets, we are being fleeced of our property and freedom. Congress is corrupt. The system has been co-opted by crooks. The last act of any government is to loot and plunder the people.
Building 7 was reported collapsed by the BBC, twenty minutes before it fell.
The 9-11 'Omission' Commission didn't address the collapse of Building 7, and 6 out of 10 9-11 Commissioners admit that their report really kinda sucks..
Over a thousand engineers and architects have put their careers on the line to stand for truth. This isn't 'fun with physics.' This isn't fun at all. People need to have and show some interest in their country and their own futures or lose them both. |
|
|
|
|
FreeUSHGA
3 thumbs up
Joined: 25 Dec 2009
Posts: 243
Location: Kansas City
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 3:39 pm Post subject: All But Banned in the USA |
#8 |
Russia Today
March 10, 2010
In this edition of CrossTalk host Peter Lavelle asks his guests why discussion of the events of 9/11 continue to attrack so much attention but is all but banned in the media mainstream.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avtvrtTV1vw
http://www.ae911truth.org/ |
|
|
|
|
wild_high_mark
3 thumbs up
Joined: 01 Jun 2008
Posts: 99
Location: Lakeview
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:21 am Post subject: Re: All But Banned in the USA |
#9 |
| FreeUSHGA wrote: |
| the events of 9/11 continue to attrack so much attention but is all but banned in the media mainstream. |
What he said!
The only interest was what the "mainstream" needs, who cares what the "fringe" thinks.
I've been busy banishing Douchbob and Alphamale from the OZ. I just got tired of their antics.
http://ozreport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=19107&start=20
Haven't heard from them in a few days.  |
|
|
|
|
FreeUSHGA
3 thumbs up
Joined: 25 Dec 2009
Posts: 243
Location: Kansas City
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 11:22 am Post subject: Re: All But Banned in the USA |
#10 |
| wild_high_mark wrote: |
| Haven't heard from them in a few days. |
They are probably at the BOD meeting with their fellow yellow lobbyist Straub.
Just read my first twitter ever and it's from the Bevis.. what is the world coming to?
Bevis says Ray Leanard and everyone rated in his last ICP class are ruled invalidated due to some cause against Ray Leanard.
The BOD must really be feeling their oats. . so much power..
Davis' mentor Karl Rove on unlimited power:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/12/rove-im-proud-of-waterboa_n_496510.html |
|
|
|
|
|
Unanswered
Highest rated...
Topics
Photos
FAQ